Divorced? Here’s why you should change your will.

Written by Cherise Hansen on July 27th, 2015. Posted in divorce, marriage, Uncategorized, wills

last will

You fall in love, get married and draw a will leaving all your worldly possessions to your spouse. Then divorce happens… and your will is forgotten. You may be lucky to find new love and you re –marry. You don’t make the time to draw a new will.

Then death happens and much to your new spouse’s dismay, your ex –spouse will now inherit all your worldly possessions.

Once you have a will, it is valid until it is revoked by a further will or your will is destroyed.

Most people forget to revoke their previous will after they get divorced. In terms of Section 2B of the Wills Act, Act 7 of 1953, if a person dies within 3 months after their divorce, and the will was executed before the date of divorce, then the will be carried out as if that person’s spouse had died before date of divorce, unless it appears from the will that the person intended their spouse to inherit in terms of their will regardless of the divorce.

What this means is that if you had a valid will before you get divorced in which your spouse would inherit; you get divorced and pass away within 3 months from the date that the divorce order is granted, then your ex-spouse will not inherit anything from you in terms of the will unless you made it clear that you intended to ex-spouse to inherit regardless of the divorce. If you pass away after this 3 month period and you had not yet changed or revoked your previous will, then your ex-spouse will inherit as per your will. You thus have a period of 3 months from date of divorce to change or revoke your will.

Divorced? Have you changed or revoked your will?

A PARENT’S RIGHT OF ACCESS

Written by Cherise Hansen on August 12th, 2013. Posted in care, child maintenance, children, cohabitation, contact, divorce, living together, maintenance, marriage, marriages, seperation

Written by Lanka Krugel

google images
google images

When two people decide to divorce each other, decisions have to be made regarding the care of any children who may be affected by the divorce. It has to be decided with which parent the children will live, when and how often the children will see and speak to the parent with whom they do not live, and whether either of the parents will be liable for paying maintenance. This also applies to parents who were living together when a child was born or even when a child was born to parents who were not living together or were married.

After much fiery debate on the subject of a father’s right to access of his child, the Children’s Act, Act 38 of 2005, has provided some certainty regarding parents’ rights of access and custody of children in South Africa. The Children’s Act came into effect on 1 April 2010.

Rights of unmarried fathers

In the past, where parents were not married to each other, an unmarried father did not have an automatic right to contact his child.  Unmarried mothers had an automatic right to contact and the child would normally live with its mother whilst the unmarried father would have to approach the court for an order allowing him to have contact with his child.

[Note: The Children’s Act replaced the common law concept of “custody” with “care” and “access” with “contact”, as defined in section 1 of the Children’s Act.]

The definition of “parent” in the Children’s Act now includes unmarried fathers and adoptive parents, but excludes the following three classes of biological parents:

  • a  man whose paternity arises from rape of or incest with the mother;
  • a  person who is biologically related to the child by reason only of being a  gamete donor   for purposes of artificial fertilisation;
  • a  person whose parental rights and responsibilities have been terminated.

Parental responsibilities and rights 

Section 1 of the Children’s Act defines a concept of “parental responsibilities and rights” to mean the responsibility and right:

(a)  to care for the child;

(b)  to maintain contact with the child;

(c)  to act as the guardian of the child; and

(d)  to contribute to the maintenance of the child.

A biological father of a child has full parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child if:

  • He is married to the child’s mother; or
  • He was married to the child’s mother at the time of the child’s conception or birth, or any time in between conception and birth.

Section 21 of the Children’s Act provides that the biological father of a child who does not have parental responsibilities and rights in respect of a child as a result of any of the aforementioned situations, may acquire such if:

  • at the time of the child’s birth he is living with the mother in a permanent life-partnership; or
  • regardless of whether he has or is living with the mother, he consents to be identified as the father or successfully applies for a court order declaring him as such. In this instance, he must have been contributing to the child’s upbringing and maintenance “for a reasonable period”.

Best Interests of child standard

The concept of “best interests” means that the court should have regard to the best interests of the child when making a decision regarding the care and contact of that child by his parents. Our Bill of Rights provides for the “best interests” concept, and the Children’s Act has now also reiterated that approach.

Section 7 of the Children’s Act provides a list of the factors to be taken into account “where relevant” when applying the best interests standard. Some of the factors that should be considered include:

  • the nature of the personal relationship between the child and his respective parents;
  • the attitude of the parents towards the child, as well as their attitude towards the exercise of their parental rights and responsibilities regarding the child;
  • the capacity of the parents to care for the child’s needs;
  •  the child’s gender,  age and level of maturity;
  • the need for the child to be brought up within a stable family environment, or, where that is not possible, in an environment resembling as closely as possible a caring family environment.

Child’s Opinion

If the court feels that the child is old enough and mature enough, then the court will also listen to the child’s opinion and take into account where the child wishes to stay.

Two other substantial changes brought about by the Children’s Act

Two other substantial changes brought about by the Children’s Act which also have a bearing on the topic on hand are:

  • Illegitimate children are no longer differentiated from legitimate children; and
  • The age of majority was changed to 18 years and is no longer 21 years.

In conclusion, the Children’s Act has assisted in providing unmarried fathers the right to have contact with their children, where in the past such fathers could only obtain such a right by virtue of a court order. While the Children’s Act widens the definition of who has an automatic right to contact with regards to a child, it also places strict limitations on who may not automatically have a right of contact to a child. The Children’s Act stipulates that the courts should always keep the best interests of the child in mind when making decisions regarding the care and contact of that child, and that the court must take certain factors into consideration when making such decisions.

 

FREQUENTLY ASKED LEGAL QUESTION:INTERIM MAINTENANCE

Written by Lanka Krugel on March 26th, 2013. Posted in care, children, contact, contribution towards legal fees., divorce, interim maintenance, maintenance, rule 43


pic_divorce

Image: Google Images
Q: I desperately want to divorce my husband as I cannot bear to live with him any longer. Our relationship has broken down and he has absolutely no respect for me. I need to get out of this nightmare but I don’t have the money to be able afford an attorney.
I stopped working when our children were born so I am completely dependent on my husband for money. I am also scared that my husband will stop paying any money to me and our children for our monthly expenses. Is there any kind of a solution for this? I am sure many other people have also found themselves in the same position.

Quick Contacts

C Bekker & Associates

 
Address:
1st Floor, Block B, 37 Harley Street, Ferndale, Randburg.